LaborCode.ph is committed to correcting material errors promptly and transparently. Readers, practitioners, agencies and subject-matter experts may report possible inaccuracies for review.
What may be corrected
Corrections may address inaccurate legal citations, misstated case holdings, outdated procedures, incorrect dates, broken source links, calculation errors, unclear wording or other information that could materially affect a reader’s understanding.
How reports are reviewed
A correction request should identify the page, the disputed statement and a reliable supporting source. The editorial team will compare the report with the applicable law, issuance, court decision or official guidance before making a change.
Types of updates
Minor spelling, grammar, formatting and link repairs may be made without a formal correction note. Material legal changes may be accompanied by an update notice, corrected date or explanatory note when transparency would help readers understand what changed.
Changes in the law
An article may have been accurate when published but later become outdated because of legislation, regulation, agency practice or jurisprudence. These are treated as substantive updates rather than necessarily as editorial errors.
No silent alteration of meaning
LaborCode.ph does not knowingly alter a material legal conclusion without reviewing the underlying sources. When a correction changes the practical meaning of an article, the revised version should make that change reasonably clear.
Correction requests may be submitted through the contact information published on LaborCode.ph. Submission does not guarantee a change, but every specific and well-supported report should receive a good-faith review.